Skip to content

AI-Powered Prior Art Search & Patent Drafting Software

Search 100+ jurisdictions, generate jurisdiction-compliant patent drafts in under 2 minutes, and maintain a complete audit trail — from prior art discovery to patent filing. Built for patent attorneys, IP managers, and pharma teams.

100+

Jurisdictions Searchable

6

Jurisdictions Supported

<2 min

Draft Generation Time

100%

Audit Trail Coverage

The Problem Every IP Team Faces

Patent attorneys spend 60–80% of their drafting time on repetitive, error-prone tasks: searching prior art across dozens of patent offices, manually cross-referencing claims, adapting drafts for different jurisdictions, and ensuring compliance with country-specific patent laws.

Prior art searches are scattered across Espacenet, Google Patents, USPTO, and WIPO, each with different interfaces, query syntax, and coverage gaps. Attorneys paste results into spreadsheets, lose track of what was considered, and can't prove their search methodology to examiners.

60–80%

of drafting time on repetitive tasks

4+ Tools

to search, no unified audit trail

Prior Art Search

One Search Bar. 100+ Jurisdictions. Zero Context-Switching.

Keywords

Search by technical terms across titles and abstracts. Handles hyphenation, stop words, and long compound queries automatically.

Inventor

Find all filings by a specific inventor. Handles titles, hyphens, and name variations. Full paginated results, not just top 10.

Applicant

Search by company or institution. Corporate suffixes (Inc., Ltd., GmbH, AG) are stripped automatically.

Patent Number

Direct lookup by publication number in any format. Spaces, commas, slashes, and kind codes are handled automatically.

AI Draft Generation

Attorney-Guided AI That Understands Patent Law

Novelty Analysis

How the invention differs from each cited reference, with risk-level assessments per reference.

Claims & Abstract

Independent and dependent claims structured per jurisdiction conventions, plus a concise abstract within word limits.

Detailed Description

Full patent specification with standard sections — Field, Background, Summary, Detailed Description, Examples.

Attorney Instructions

Add custom guidance like "Emphasise the thermal regulation advantage" — the AI weighs instructions alongside jurisdiction rules.

6 Jurisdictions, Each With Specialised Rules

Patent law rules are embedded in every generation, not left to the attorney to specify.

USUSPTO

35 USC 101/102/103 compliance, means-plus-function format, Markush groups

EPEPO

Article 52/54/56 EPC, two-part claim format, technical effect language

INIPO

Section 3(d)/(i)/(j)/(k) exclusions, method-of-treatment prohibition, enhanced efficacy requirements

WOWIPO

International-stage neutral drafting, broad claims for national phase entry

JPJPO

Japanese Patent Act Articles 29/36 compliance, detailed embodiment requirements

CNCNIPA

Article 22/25/26 compliance, explicit technical problem-solution format

DOCX Export

From AI draft to attorney's desk in one click. Export any draft as a professionally formatted Word document.

  • Cover page with tenant name, invention title, jurisdiction, and version
  • AI disclaimer callout on AI-generated drafts
  • Patent-standard headings (FIELD, BACKGROUND, SUMMARY) auto-detected as H2
  • Prior Art Appendix table with publication numbers and relevance scores
  • Footer with tenant name, date, draft version, and page numbers

Cost Analytics with FX Conversion

See your total patent cost exposure in one currency. Converts everything using historical exchange rates.

  • 12 patent-relevant currencies — USD, EUR, INR, JPY, CNY, CHF, GBP, KRW, AUD, CAD, BRL, SGD
  • Historical rate accuracy — uses the rate from the fee's due date, not today's rate
  • Coverage reporting — shows which fees were converted and which currencies had missing rates
  • Locale-aware formatting — INR in Lakhs/Crores, JPY/CNY in 万/億, USD/EUR/GBP in K/M/B
Security

Built for Enterprise Procurement Reviews

Every security control is designed for regulated IP workflows and audit readiness.

5-Layer Prompt Defense

  • Input sanitisation — XML, HTML, zero-width Unicode stripped
  • Structural containment — user inputs in BEGIN/END markers
  • System prompt hardening — security rules override conflicts
  • Output validation — post-generation anomaly detection
  • Human review — mandatory attorney sign-off

Zero Data Retention

  • Anthropic zero-retention API policy
  • Prompts contain only invention details + public patent data
  • Generated content stored exclusively in your PostgreSQL database
  • No training on your data — ever

Role-Based Access Control

  • draft:generate is separate from draft:write
  • Paralegals can create manual drafts and add review notes
  • Only authorised users can trigger AI generation
  • Server-side enforcement — frontend gating is defense-in-depth

Tenant Isolation

  • Every query runs inside Row-Level Security with forced policies
  • Cross-tenant data exposure is architecturally impossible
  • Enforced at the database engine level, not application logic

Rate Limiting

  • Configurable per-tenant limits
  • Maximum concurrent generations and daily cap
  • Per-family cooldown period
  • Prevents runaway API costs

Complete Audit Trail

  • Who searched, what was saved, which prior art the AI considered
  • Every attorney edit, status change, and export logged
  • reason_for_change mandatory on sensitive transitions
  • Immutable, tamper-proof records

How It Fits Into the Attorney's Workflow

Every step is audited. Every decision is traceable. Every draft is versioned.

STEP 01

Search

Search prior art across 100+ jurisdictions

STEP 02

Save

Save relevant references with relevance scoring

STEP 03

Paste

Paste missing claims from USPTO or InPASS

STEP 04

Select

Select references and describe the invention

STEP 05

Generate

AI generates jurisdiction-compliant draft

STEP 06

Review

Attorney reviews, adds instructions, regenerates

STEP 07

Export

Export to DOCX for tracked-changes review

STEP 08

Approve

Status workflow: draft → in_review → approved

What Makes This Different

Not Generic AI

Jurisdiction-specific patent law rules are embedded in the system prompt, not left to the attorney to specify.

Not a Black Box

Prior art snapshots, token counts, model versions, and complete edit history are preserved for compliance.

Not a Replacement

The AI is the assistant; the attorney is the author. Mandatory review workflows ensure human judgment at every decision.

Not Standalone

Integrated directly into the patent family workflow — prior art, drafts, and prosecution history in one place.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is AI-generated content safe for patent filing?

AI drafts are a starting point, not a final filing. Every draft includes a mandatory disclaimer, requires attorney review, and follows a status workflow (draft → in review → approved). No content can be exported without human sign-off. Prior art snapshots and generation metadata are preserved for audit.

How does the prior art search differ from Google Patents?

The search queries the EPO global patent database (100+ jurisdictions) directly from within your patent family view. Results are saved with relevance scores and attorney notes as part of your auditable record. No context-switching between tools, no copy-pasting into spreadsheets.

What happens if the AI hallucinates a reference?

The AI only analyzes prior art references you explicitly select and save. It cannot fabricate references because the input is a frozen snapshot of real patents from the EPO database. The snapshot is immutable — auditors can always verify exactly which references the AI considered.

Can I control what the AI generates?

Yes. Attorney Instructions let you guide the generation: "Emphasise the thermal regulation advantage over Reference 3" or "Use cautious novelty language for the bispecific claims." The AI weighs these alongside jurisdiction-specific rules. You can also regenerate with different instructions — each version is preserved.

How are prior art snapshots preserved?

When you generate a draft, the selected prior art references are frozen as an immutable snapshot. Each draft version has its own snapshot, so auditors can see exactly which references were considered for any version. Snapshots include publication numbers, titles, applicants, IPC codes, and relevance scores.

What AI model powers the drafting?

The platform uses Anthropic Claude with extended thinking for patent draft generation. Model version and token counts are recorded with every generation for compliance. Anthropic's zero-retention API policy means your data is never stored by the AI provider.

Ready to Transform Your Patent Workflow?

Start searching prior art and generating jurisdiction-compliant drafts today.

Enterprise Trust

Built for teams that can't afford to compromise on security

SOC 2-Aligned Controls
21 CFR Part 11-Ready
Enterprise SSO
AES-256 Encryption
MFA Support
Encrypted Infrastructure

Built for regulated patent teams handling confidential invention data, audit-sensitive workflows, and multi-jurisdiction portfolios.

DI

Design Your Invention Team

IP Management Platform